Perspectivas sobre la Tecnología Aplicada a la Educación en América Latina: Evaluación Crítica de Enfoques y Recursos
Palabras clave:
Tecnología Educativa, brechas digitales, competencias digitalesResumen
La Tecnología Educativa (TE) en América Latina constituye un ámbito en constante evolución, caracterizado por su complejidad y multidimensionalidad, condicionado tanto por los avances conceptuales y tecnológicos como por las políticas públicas y las demandas sociales emergentes. Antes de la pandemia de la COVID-19, la TE era concebida principalmente como un medio de apoyo para optimizar los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje. No obstante, la crisis sanitaria evidenció de manera contundente las desigualdades digitales existentes, afectando de forma particular a las poblaciones en situación de vulnerabilidad y subrayando la urgencia de fortalecer las competencias digitales de docentes y estudiantes. En la actualidad, la TE debe entenderse más allá del uso instrumental de recursos tecnológicos, considerándose una estrategia pedagógica orientada a generar aprendizajes significativos, favorecer la equidad digital y promover la innovación en los contextos educativos. Su adecuada implementación demanda un enfoque interdisciplinario, crítico y un compromiso institucional sólido para garantizar mejoras sustanciales en la calidad educativa de la región. Sin embargo, persisten obstáculos relevantes, como la brecha digital y la resistencia al cambio de parte del profesorado, que limitan la consolidación de la TE, especialmente en zonas rurales y contextos marginados donde los recursos son escasos.
Referencias
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2017). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Bates, A. W., & Sangrà, A. (2019). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6.
Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87–104.
DeSchryver, M., Shumar, W., & Bourassa, D. J. (2016). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 58-68.
Domingo, J., & Gargallo, B. (2019). Formación del profesorado en competencias digitales: retos y estrategias. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 60, 1-23.
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming an online teacher: Tools and strategies for effective online education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 327-335.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Rethinking education in the digital era: New approaches to teaching and learning. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22, e24468.
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6-30.
Gros, B., & Silva, J. (2020). Propuestas para una enseñanza híbrida: más allá del aula. Revista de Tecnología Educativa, 42(1), 112-130.
Hall, A., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Use of video podcasts in higher education: What works? Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 48-62.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2020). Online teaching and learning with technology: Principles and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Herrington, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Authentic learning in the digital age: Engaging students with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 170-185.
Hsu, P. S., & Ching, Y. H. (2013). Mobile app design for teaching and learning: Educators’ experiences in an online graduate course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4), 117-139.
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilization of learning analytics for study success: Reflections on current empirical findings. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106216.
Ito, M., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jang, H., & Kim, J. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on student achievement: A meta‐analysis. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 313-334.
Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of podcasting in higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(3).
Kim, C., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3), 207-256.
Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275-297). Cambridge University Press.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
Lee, M. J. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints: Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches to distance education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 154-169.
Li, C., & Lalani, F. (220). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever: This is how. World Economic Forum.
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873.
Liu, M., McKelroy, E., & Corliss, S. B. (2015). Teachers’ self-efficacy and technology integration: Grade matters. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 206–221.
Logan, K., & Pellicer, L. (2022). Computational thinking in early childhood education: An international overview. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100078.
Lorz, M., & Berveling, J. (2018). Educational robotics and programming for young children: Benefits and challenges for inclusive education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 573-586.
Martín, F., & Sunley, R. (2021). Teacher perceptions of remote teaching during COVID-19: Challenges and solutions. Education Sciences, 11(11), 712.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Mok, K. H., & Han, X. (2020). Online education and the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 195–200.
Moravec, M., et al. (2010). Learning to become: The role of digital and technologies in lifelong learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 289-297.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Mouza, C., Yang, H., Pan, Y. C., Ozden, S. Y., & Pollock, L. (2016). Resetting educational technology coursework for pre-service teachers: A computational thinking approach to the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 81-99.
Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317.
Papastergiou, M. (2010). Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ learning through digital games and simulations. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-18.
Pasquini, L., & Trujillo, E. (2019). Competencias digitales docentes: incluencia y retos en la educación contemporánea. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, 1(1), 45-60.
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Reiser, R. A. (2016). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of instructional technology innovations? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 137-154.
Ribeiro, M., Marcone, R., & Deliza, J. (2020). Digital tools for collaborative learning: Systematic review and analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5401-5418.
Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., et al. (2020). Developing computational thinking through robotics in primary school: The effects on the executive functions and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 159, 104032.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30-40.
Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education.
Swan, K. (2018). Theories and frameworks for online learning. Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 39–62). Routledge.
Tondeur, J., et al. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 188-206.
Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “Third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057-1060.
Veletsianos, G., & Moe, R. (2017). The rise of educational technology as a field of inquiry. Educational Technology, 57(5), 10-19.
Wang, T., et al. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on online education in China: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(10), 592.
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23.
Zhang, S., et al. (2020). Effects of flipped classroom on student achievement and higher-order thinking skills in medical education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 20, 309.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Mireles , Luis Iván Porras Ramírez (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los artículos publicados en la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Esta licencia permite a terceros descargar, copiar, distribuir, adaptar y reutilizar una obra, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que se otorgue el crédito adecuado al autor original.
